The Shemwell Family

John McGehee: Name, Spouses, and Descendants Introduction: In tracing out John’s lineage, I have found that his surname has many spellings; i.e., Mackgehee, McGehee, McGeehee, Megehee, Megehe, etc. Due to the preponderance of documented sources, I have chosen the surname "McGehee"; but, have included all the other spellings as "Alternate Names". Additionally, there are a lot of McGehee trees to be found in the various genealogies sites. The majority of those have no sources to support the proposed trees and appear to just be copies of each other. Some of the sites do have some sources and I have used those, along with the documented sources found on Family Search to create a "best guesstimate" as to what the lineage looks like. To be clear, we have not been able to find all the sources needed to be 100% confident of John McGehee’s tree. As we continue to find more documented sources, we can then confidently adjust the McGehee tree. Clearly, this is not an exact science and many times we have to make some decisions on circumstantial evidence. I will continue to look for more definitive facts on the McGehee family tree. Spouses - Facts: 1 Mrs John McGehee (G3QH-TGS) o Lifespan: about 1805 -> Deceased o Married John before 1822 since their first child was born in 1822. o Referenced in the 1830 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1800 to 1810. o No records have been found to identify the true name of John’s first spouse 2 “Milly” McGehee (K2XM-QFD) o Lifespan: about 1815 -> May 1858. Death date is based on John’s marriage to Matilda O’Barr in April 1858. o Married John in about 1835. Their first child was born in about 1837. o Referenced in the 1840 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1811 to 1820. o Was mentioned in the 1850 US Census as "Milly" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1815. 3 Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) o Lifespan: about 1820 (birth year based on 1850 Census) -> after 1880 o Married John on May 9, 1858. This marriage is documented via Arkansas Marriages. o Was mentioned in the 1860 US Census as "Matilda" with a birth location Tennessee and estimated birth year of 1820. o John and Mathilda’s Divorce Case (see attached source) was issued a Continuance in 1858 and dismissed in 1869. o Mathilda was mentioned in the 1880 Census as a "Widow". Her estimated birth year was 1812. 4 Rosanna Riley (G9CB-VT5) o Lifespan: 1837 -> after 1870 o Was mentioned in the 1870 US Census as "Rosanna" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1837. Spouses - Detailed Discussion: "Milly" McGehee (K2XM-QFD) and Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) are not the same person. INTRODUCTION: There have been several profile modifications on Milly McGehee (nee??) and Matilda O’Barr. Many editors have grouped Milly and Mathilda as a single person. Time-wise, that is plausible as is the fact that "Milly" could possibly be a nickname for a "Matilda". However, based on the available records and data, it appears that they are two separate persons. I would welcome any other research data that either supports or contradicts this assumption. I would request that only bonifide sources be stated as opposed to “… I found an un-sourced tree on Ancestry that …..”. If trees found on other sites can provide real data, then please provide it and we can adjust the tree accordingly. Based on McGehee family research, I will revise this part of the tree to reflect this presented analysis. The following analysis summary will step through the various Census, Marriage, Divorce, and Probate records we currently have. One of my primary assumptions is that in the mid-1800s only married couples had children. DATA: The earliest records we have showing John is married surfaces in the 1840 Census (Arkansas). That Census lists a Female in the 20-29 age category which corresponds to an 1811 -> 1820 birth year. There is a listing of other household members; but, no information on birth states and relationships. We have been unable to find any marriage records around that time showing that John was married. The 1850 Census (Arkansas, December 11) starts to provide some real data. That Census lists (presumably John’s wife) a “Milly” with an estimated birth year of 1815 and birth state of Missouri. Some children are listed which have been resourced to show they are John’s children. Based on the age of the children, it is estimated that John and Milly would have been married in about 1835. There is another 1850 Census (Tennessee, October 9) that lists a “Matilda O’Barr” who is living with her parents. Her birth year is listed as 1820 and birth place being South Carolina. Note that if "Milly" and Matilda were the same person, it is odd that Oct 1850 her birth state is South Carolina and in Dec 1850 a Missouri birth state is listed. On May 9, 1859 John McGehee and Matilda O’Barr were married in Conway, Arkansas. On June 17, 1859 John and Mathilda McGehee are mentioned in a land deal with CH Rogers. The 1860 Census (Arkansas, July 9) clearly depicts a "Matilda" with an estimated birth year of 1820 and born in Tennessee. Another O’Barr family member and researcher has noted that while she was born in South Carolina, her family settled in Tennessee when she was very young. The researcher felt this could be the explanation of the differing birth states. On April 13, 1869 the Divorce Case between John and Matilda is dismissed. The 1870 Census (Missouri, June 16) shows John having a new wife (Rosanna) with some step children. We have been unable to find any 1870 Census records for Matilda either as a McGehee or O’Barr. In 1875 there are Probate Records for the estate of John McGehee. His sister (Anna) and grandson (Joshua) are listed as Administrators. The 1880 Census (Arkansas, June 15) lists a Matilda O’Barr as a “Widow” living in her niece’s household. Her estimated birth year is 1812. SUMMARY: Based on the analysis and data discussed, it is highly probable that “Milly” and Mathilda were two separate people. Both were married to John McGehee. There are no documents that support “Milly” and Matilda are the same person. For example, had we found two versions of the 1858 Marriage Record … one with the name “Milly” and one with the name Matilda … then that would support they were the same person. But, we could not find that kind of supporting documents. The birth state differences in the 1850 Census cannot be ignored and strongly suggest that are documenting two different people. The only marriage record we can find for John is his marriage to Matilda O'Barr in 1858. His children, presumably who mother was “Milly”, supports a 1835 marriage date. It doesn't seem plausible that John would have children with “Milly” in the 1830s but not marry her until 1858. This further suggests that Milly and Matilda were different persons.

John McGehee: Name, Spouses, and Descendants Introduction: In tracing out John’s lineage, I have found that his surname has many spellings; i.e., Mackgehee, McGehee, McGeehee, Megehee, Megehe, etc. Due to the preponderance of documented sources, I have chosen the surname "McGehee"; but, have included all the other spellings as "Alternate Names". Additionally, there are a lot of McGehee trees to be found in the various genealogies sites. The majority of those have no sources to support the proposed trees and appear to just be copies of each other. Some of the sites do have some sources and I have used those, along with the documented sources found on Family Search to create a "best guesstimate" as to what the lineage looks like. To be clear, we have not been able to find all the sources needed to be 100% confident of John McGehee’s tree. As we continue to find more documented sources, we can then confidently adjust the McGehee tree. Clearly, this is not an exact science and many times we have to make some decisions on circumstantial evidence. I will continue to look for more definitive facts on the McGehee family tree. Spouses - Facts: 1 Mrs John McGehee (G3QH-TGS) o Lifespan: about 1805 -> Deceased o Married John before 1822 since their first child was born in 1822. o Referenced in the 1830 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1800 to 1810. o No records have been found to identify the true name of John’s first spouse 2 “Milly” McGehee (K2XM-QFD) o Lifespan: about 1815 -> May 1858. Death date is based on John’s marriage to Matilda O’Barr in April 1858. o Married John in about 1835. Their first child was born in about 1837. o Referenced in the 1840 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1811 to 1820. o Was mentioned in the 1850 US Census as "Milly" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1815. 3 Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) o Lifespan: about 1820 (birth year based on 1850 Census) -> after 1880 o Married John on May 9, 1858. This marriage is documented via Arkansas Marriages. o Was mentioned in the 1860 US Census as "Matilda" with a birth location Tennessee and estimated birth year of 1820. o John and Mathilda’s Divorce Case (see attached source) was issued a Continuance in 1858 and dismissed in 1869. o Mathilda was mentioned in the 1880 Census as a "Widow". Her estimated birth year was 1812. 4 Rosanna Riley (G9CB-VT5) o Lifespan: 1837 -> after 1870 o Was mentioned in the 1870 US Census as "Rosanna" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1837. Spouses - Detailed Discussion: "Milly" McGehee (K2XM-QFD) and Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) are not the same person. INTRODUCTION: There have been several profile modifications on Milly McGehee (nee??) and Matilda O’Barr. Many editors have grouped Milly and Mathilda as a single person. Time-wise, that is plausible as is the fact that "Milly" could possibly be a nickname for a "Matilda". However, based on the available records and data, it appears that they are two separate persons. I would welcome any other research data that either supports or contradicts this assumption. I would request that only bonifide sources be stated as opposed to “… I found an un-sourced tree on Ancestry that …..”. If trees found on other sites can provide real data, then please provide it and we can adjust the tree accordingly. Based on McGehee family research, I will revise this part of the tree to reflect this presented analysis. The following analysis summary will step through the various Census, Marriage, Divorce, and Probate records we currently have. One of my primary assumptions is that in the mid-1800s only married couples had children. DATA: The earliest records we have showing John is married surfaces in the 1840 Census (Arkansas). That Census lists a Female in the 20-29 age category which corresponds to an 1811 -> 1820 birth year. There is a listing of other household members; but, no information on birth states and relationships. We have been unable to find any marriage records around that time showing that John was married. The 1850 Census (Arkansas, December 11) starts to provide some real data. That Census lists (presumably John’s wife) a “Milly” with an estimated birth year of 1815 and birth state of Missouri. Some children are listed which have been resourced to show they are John’s children. Based on the age of the children, it is estimated that John and Milly would have been married in about 1835. There is another 1850 Census (Tennessee, October 9) that lists a “Matilda O’Barr” who is living with her parents. Her birth year is listed as 1820 and birth place being South Carolina. Note that if "Milly" and Matilda were the same person, it is odd that Oct 1850 her birth state is South Carolina and in Dec 1850 a Missouri birth state is listed. On May 9, 1859 John McGehee and Matilda O’Barr were married in Conway, Arkansas. On June 17, 1859 John and Mathilda McGehee are mentioned in a land deal with CH Rogers. The 1860 Census (Arkansas, July 9) clearly depicts a "Matilda" with an estimated birth year of 1820 and born in Tennessee. Another O’Barr family member and researcher has noted that while she was born in South Carolina, her family settled in Tennessee when she was very young. The researcher felt this could be the explanation of the differing birth states. On April 13, 1869 the Divorce Case between John and Matilda is dismissed. The 1870 Census (Missouri, June 16) shows John having a new wife (Rosanna) with some step children. We have been unable to find any 1870 Census records for Matilda either as a McGehee or O’Barr. In 1875 there are Probate Records for the estate of John McGehee. His sister (Anna) and grandson (Joshua) are listed as Administrators. The 1880 Census (Arkansas, June 15) lists a Matilda O’Barr as a “Widow” living in her niece’s household. Her estimated birth year is 1812. SUMMARY: Based on the analysis and data discussed, it is highly probable that “Milly” and Mathilda were two separate people. Both were married to John McGehee. There are no documents that support “Milly” and Matilda are the same person. For example, had we found two versions of the 1858 Marriage Record … one with the name “Milly” and one with the name Matilda … then that would support they were the same person. But, we could not find that kind of supporting documents. The birth state differences in the 1850 Census cannot be ignored and strongly suggest that are documenting two different people. The only marriage record we can find for John is his marriage to Matilda O'Barr in 1858. His children, presumably who mother was “Milly”, supports a 1835 marriage date. It doesn't seem plausible that John would have children with “Milly” in the 1830s but not marry her until 1858. This further suggests that Milly and Matilda were different persons.

Transcription: In the name of God Amen, I Osborn McGeehe have this day made this my last will and testament. Clause the first. I do appoint John McGeehe my only son my executor to carry this my will into effect after my death. Cl 2. I give and bequeath both Real Chase and personal Estate to my wife Rebecca McGeehe during her natural life after my funeral expenses and debts are paid. Cl 3. After the death of my beloved wife it is my desire that my Executor John McGeehe shall sell all my personal Estate and collect all debts that may be due me or my deceased wife and have my Six Negroes namely, Peggy, John, Jane, Frank, Martin and Rachel, all matured and divided them by lot to six of my children and those of my children that deserve the most valuable Negros are to pay the overplus into hotchpot so that my seventh child shall have an equal share in money paid out of hotchpot, and divide the slaves and money owing from debts, and the sale of my personal Estate so that each of my seven children to wit Ann Johnson, John McGeehe, Patsey Knighton, Sally Eppsa, Nelly Dorherty, Nancy Pruitt, and Fanny Dorherty shall have an equal share of all of my worldly effects. Cl 4. It is my desire that my Executor John McGeehe pay over the several portions belonging to each of my daughters to them and take their receipt for the same which shall be a discharge for their portions of my estate. Cl 5. it is my will that the Estate given by me to my daughters are not later sold or in any way to be disposed of to pay debts of their husbands, but shall and remain for the maintenance of my daughters. Cl 6. it is my will that courts of law and equity if ever my wife shall be contested shall construe the same according to the intention of the testators have known in this my Last Will and Testament. In the name of God Amen. In testimony where of I have unto set my hand and seal this 30th day of October AD 1844. Osborn (his mark) McGeehe Seal Signed by making his hands and acknowledging the same, in presence of us Name Signed by W L Simms and Andre Gordon State of Arkansas Conway County I Harrison H Higgins, clerk of the circuit court and Exofficio Recorder for the county aforesaid do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument of writing was filed with me for safekeeping and by Request of the testator was Recorded in the Record Book C Page 75 – 6 In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal of office this 30th day of October AD 1844, H H Higgins Clerk and Exofficio Recorder

John McGehee was a witness at the wedding of Cyrus Maxwell and Elizabeth Cargile in Conway, Arkansas on January 3, 1852.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of Osborn McGehee's estate from 1857 to 1861. On April 14, 1857 (based on a Petition by John McGehee), the court found that Osborn McGehee was not capable of managing his own affairs. At that time Osborn was assigned a Guardian (Joses Moses). On July 15, 1857 Court records indicate that Osborn was deceased, and John McGehee (along with John Wilbank) were listed as the Estate Administrators.

COURT SUMMARIES: April 14, 1857 John McGehee brought a motion before the court that his father, Osborn McGehee, was incapable of handling his own affairs. The judge formed a jury and ordered William Turner and 11 other sworn men to inquire into the mental condition of Osborn McGehee. After examining the evidence, the Jury returned to the court with the verdict that Osborn MCGehee was of unsound mind and incapable of handling his own affairs. The judge ordered that the court resume tomorrow morning. April 15, 1857 The judge restated the verdict from the hearing on April 14, 1857; namely, that Osborn McGehee was of unsound mind and incapable of handling his own affairs, The judge appointed Joshua Moses to be the guardian of Osborn McGehee and his property. Note that in reviewing several other court records in that county it was found that Joshua Moses was commonly appointed as a guardian by the court. Further, it was noted that Joshua Moses was identifed (in another court proceeding) as a Court Clerk. April 16, 1857 Joshua Moses filed a petition to the court for the sale of all of Osborn McGehee's personal property not under dispute. The judge ordered Joshua Moses to secure all the property not under dispute. The property sale was ordered to occur as soon as possible after giving the proper notice required by law. July 15, 1857 Joshua Moses filed the additional inventory of the estate of Osborn McGehee. He also submitted a claim ($55.35) from Anna Johnson (nee McGehee) for boarding, nursing, and clothing for Osborn and his wife from March 27, 1857 to June 25, 1857. Attorneys W.W. Edwards and Jordan submitted a claim for their services. July 15, 1857 The court gave letters of administration to John McGehee and John Willbanks on the estate of Osborn McGehee, Deceased. Both men filed a Bond (signed by R. L. Cargile and A. G. Kendall) with the court. The court approved the securities listed in the Bond. October 14, 1857 The judge referenced the earlier work by Joshua Moses in which he identified all the claims and demands on the estate of Osborn McGehee. The judge further noted that a $500 payment be made to W. W. Edwards and P. Gordon for their professional services. The judge ruled that $150 be paid to Benjamin F. Howard for the delivery to Joshua Moses the six negro slaves claimed to belong to the estate. The judge ordered Joshua Moses to pay an additional sums of $639.77 and $40 against other claims on the estate. October 14, 1857 The judge ordered the clerk to give letters of administration given to John McGehee and John Willbanks. This seems to be a duplicate order from the July 15, 1857 court proceedings. The court ordered the case continued. January 12, 1858 The judge ordered that $25 be paid to S. S. Ford, attorney, for his services while he procured Osborn McGehee's guardianship for John McGehee in April 1857. January 12,1858 The court orders that the Administrators can hire out the slaves of the estate from January 12, 1858 to May 15, 1868. The court orders that the terms of the hire be beneficial to the estate. Further, Notes for the hire of the slaves my have approved security with a Bond issued in a sufficient and lawful sum for the return and delivery of the slaves. January 13, 1858 The judge noted that Joshua Moses was the guardian of Osborn McGehee who was of unsound mind. Joshua Moses filed an account with vouchers for his ward (Osborn McGehee). The judge said that the account stays on file until next time in court for confirmation and final settlement, and the inspection of all persons interested in the estate. April 13, 1858 John McGehee and John Willbanks file a motion and the judge orders that the case be continued until next time in court. April 14, 1858: The court orders that $5.46 be paid to R L Cargile for his services as the Sheriff in this case. The judge also ruled that the jurors who decided the sanity of Osborn McGehee would be paid $1 per day of jury service. Payments were made to three jurors. April 14, 1858 The judge ordered that all the claims against the estate be paid. The judge also ordered that John Willbanks and B. A. Still be paid $13.90 for services. He further ordered that James W. Actkinson be paid $5 for the coffin he supplied and identified this as a First Class Claim. Note that First Class Claims are funeral and burial expenses (paid by any person), expenses of administration, and statutory custodial claims. April 14, 1858 Based on a motion by W. W. Edwards, the judge ordered that all claims be paid by the administration of the estate. The judge further noted that Joshua Moses was the late guardian of Osborn McGehee, deceased. April 14, 1858 The judge claimed that no exceptions have been filed to the account. He ordered that the guardian, Joshua Moses, be paid $150 and case continued until next time in court. April 15, 1858: The court allows claims of $9.75 and $6.00 to be paid against the Estate October 13, 1858 Joshua Moses submits a final settlement for the estate. The claims the account is current and the case is continued until the next term for the inspection of al persons interested in the estate. October 14, 1858 Mr. Edwards, attorney for John McGehee and John Willbanks, appeared before the court. He addressed a petition asking for the sale of the slave's belongings. The judge ordered that the sale be published in the True Democrat, a paper in Little Rock, Alabama, for at least 6 weeks. The judge stated that the slaves could not be divided. The slaves were to be sold in the town of Springfield in the county of Conway on the second Monday of January 1859 for cash in hand. The public was to be given at least 20 days notice on the time and place of the sale and a description of the property. January 12, 1859 The court acknowledges that Joshua Moses at the previous term of the court filed his account for the inspection of all persons interested in this estate. The court confirmed the account and ordered the guardian charged with the sum of ?? Dollars. January 13, 1859 John Griffin comes before the court and presents a claim on the estate for $0.85. The judge approves the Fourth Class Claim. Note that Fourth Class Claims are for money due employees of the decedent of not more than $800.00 for each claimant for services rendered within 4 months prior to the decedent's death and expenses attending the decedent's last illness. January 13, 1859 The judge stated that Joshua Moses has made final settlement for the estate and has nothing more in his hand belonging to the estate. Further, the judge orders that Joshua Moses be released as guardian, his bond be cancelled, and the case discontinued from the docket. January 17, 1859 B. B. Still appears before the court and files a claim on the estate for payment of $8.50. The court approves the Fourth Class Claim. Note that Fourth Class Claims are for money due employees of the decedent of not more than $800.00 for each claimant for services rendered within 4 months prior to the decedent's death and expenses attending the decedent's last illness. January 17, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks filed that their account on the estate is current. The court orders that it be filed for the inspection of all persons interested in the estate. The case is ordered to be continued until the next term. April 12, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks present a Sale Bill of the Slaves which belongs to the estate. The sale was filed on January 11, 1859 for the sum amounting to $5574 which will be charged to the Administrators. April 13, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks present to the judge that they have a large amount of money belonging to the estate. They claimed the money cannot be loaned out without safety and that some of the heirs are in needy circumstances. The judge orders that $600 be paid to each of the estate's heirs. This $600 payment would be viewed by the court as part of their distinctive share in the estate. The judge ordered the case continued until the next term. April 13, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the judge. The judge states that for 3 days there have been no claims from persons against the estate. He claims that the account is confirmed and now totals $5944.22 July 13, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The case is continued until the next term of the court. October 13, 1859 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The case is continued until the next term of the court. January 12, 1860 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The case is continued until the next term of the court. April 11, 1860 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The case is continued until the next term of the court. July 11, 1860 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The case is continued until the next term of the court. October 10, 1860 The court states the account is confirmed. The court declares the case is continued to allow all interested parties to review the account. January 16, 1861 John McGehee and John Willbanks come before the court. The court states that the public review of the account has provided no exceptions. The court claims that the account is current and discharges the Administrators and closes the case.

Andrew J. West vs John McGehee GENERAL SUMMARY: Andrew J. West is suing John McGehee for the return of his Bay Filly (horse). A jury of 12 men find in favor of Andrew J. West. The court orders John McGehee to: (1) return the Bay Filly, (2) be fined a total of one cent, and (3) pay all court costs. CASE DETAILS: September 16, 1857: "And now on this day comes said defendant by Edwards and Fern, his attorneys, and files herein his motion in writing to dismiss said suit, which motion being taken up and considered by the court, and the court being sufficiently advised in the premises, over-rules said motion. Whereupon said defendant by his attorney by leave of the court from obtained files his two several pleas herein --- as follows --- general issue and property in defendant. To which said pleas of general issue, plaintiff to issue, and to said plea of property in defendant, plaintiff filed his general replication to which replication defendant takes issue, all of which is taken by the consent of parties in that upon the record. And both parties announcing themselves ready for trial, the court ordered a jury to come --- and therefore came a jury consisting of James Cusey and eleven other good and lawful men, citizens of said Conway County who were severally sworn to will and truly try the issues joined in their cause between said plaintiff and defendant herein once a true verdict to give according to a prosecutable law and the evidence. And after the jury had heard all the evidence advanced via the trial, and the argument of counsel, retired under the charge of the court to consider of their verdict, and afterwards, on the same day returned into court here the following verdict. "We the jury find the issues in this case in favor of the plaintiff, and assess his damages at one cent --- signed by James Cusey, Foreman" which said verdict is ordered by the court to be received, and entered of record; And thereupon the court being well and sufficiently advised as to what judgment to render, and in appearing from the return of the Sheriff of Conway County, endorsed is attached to the Writ of Reflevin in this cause, that the Bay Filly, mentioned and described in said plaintiff's aduration had been taken or ??? by virtue of said court issued in the cause out of the hands and possession of said defendant, and delivered to said plaintiff, as commanded by said Writ of Replevin: It is therefore ordered, considered, and adjudged by the court here, that said plaintiff do have and retain possession of said Bay Filly, so described in his said declarations, which was in controversy in this suit- and that he further have and recover of and from said defendant the sum of one cent for his damages ??? by reason of the wrongful and detention of said Bay Filly by said defendant, together with all his costs in this suit laid out and expended --- And that he have execution therefor." September 16, 1857: "Comes the defendant by attorney, S. J. Honer, and motion for new trial --- which motion being considered by the court is over-ruled." September 17, 1857: "And now In this day comes said defendant by Edwards and Fern, his attorneys, his written motion herin for a new trial said motion after being fully considered the same is by the court over-ruled."

John McGehee: Name, Spouses, and Descendants Introduction: In tracing out John’s lineage, I have found that his surname has many spellings; i.e., Mackgehee, McGehee, McGeehee, Megehee, Megehe, etc. Due to the preponderance of documented sources, I have chosen the surname "McGehee"; but, have included all the other spellings as "Alternate Names". Additionally, there are a lot of McGehee trees to be found in the various genealogies sites. The majority of those have no sources to support the proposed trees and appear to just be copies of each other. Some of the sites do have some sources and I have used those, along with the documented sources found on Family Search to create a "best guesstimate" as to what the lineage looks like. To be clear, we have not been able to find all the sources needed to be 100% confident of John McGehee’s tree. As we continue to find more documented sources, we can then confidently adjust the McGehee tree. Clearly, this is not an exact science and many times we have to make some decisions on circumstantial evidence. I will continue to look for more definitive facts on the McGehee family tree. Spouses - Facts: 1 Mrs John McGehee (G3QH-TGS) o Lifespan: about 1805 -> Deceased o Married John before 1822 since their first child was born in 1822. o Referenced in the 1830 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1800 to 1810. o No records have been found to identify the true name of John’s first spouse 2 “Milly” McGehee (K2XM-QFD) o Lifespan: about 1815 -> May 1858. Death date is based on John’s marriage to Matilda O’Barr in April 1858. o Married John in about 1835. Their first child was born in about 1837. o Referenced in the 1840 Census as a Female in the 20 to 29 age category. This suggests a birth year of 1811 to 1820. o Was mentioned in the 1850 US Census as "Milly" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1815. 3 Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) o Lifespan: about 1820 (birth year based on 1850 Census) -> after 1880 o Married John on May 9, 1858. This marriage is documented via Arkansas Marriages. o Was mentioned in the 1860 US Census as "Matilda" with a birth location Tennessee and estimated birth year of 1820. o John and Mathilda’s Divorce Case (see attached source) was issued a Continuance in 1858 and dismissed in 1869. o Mathilda was mentioned in the 1880 Census as a "Widow". Her estimated birth year was 1812. 4 Rosanna Riley (G9CB-VT5) o Lifespan: 1837 -> after 1870 o Was mentioned in the 1870 US Census as "Rosanna" with a birth location of Missouri and estimated birth year of 1837. Spouses - Detailed Discussion: "Milly" McGehee (K2XM-QFD) and Matilda O’Barr (L6D8-G92) are not the same person. INTRODUCTION: There have been several profile modifications on Milly McGehee (nee??) and Matilda O’Barr. Many editors have grouped Milly and Mathilda as a single person. Time-wise, that is plausible as is the fact that "Milly" could possibly be a nickname for a "Matilda". However, based on the available records and data, it appears that they are two separate persons. I would welcome any other research data that either supports or contradicts this assumption. I would request that only bonifide sources be stated as opposed to “… I found an un-sourced tree on Ancestry that …..”. If trees found on other sites can provide real data, then please provide it and we can adjust the tree accordingly. Based on McGehee family research, I will revise this part of the tree to reflect this presented analysis. The following analysis summary will step through the various Census, Marriage, Divorce, and Probate records we currently have. One of my primary assumptions is that in the mid-1800s only married couples had children. DATA: The earliest records we have showing John is married surfaces in the 1840 Census (Arkansas). That Census lists a Female in the 20-29 age category which corresponds to an 1811 -> 1820 birth year. There is a listing of other household members; but, no information on birth states and relationships. We have been unable to find any marriage records around that time showing that John was married. The 1850 Census (Arkansas, December 11) starts to provide some real data. That Census lists (presumably John’s wife) a “Milly” with an estimated birth year of 1815 and birth state of Missouri. Some children are listed which have been resourced to show they are John’s children. Based on the age of the children, it is estimated that John and Milly would have been married in about 1835. There is another 1850 Census (Tennessee, October 9) that lists a “Matilda O’Barr” who is living with her parents. Her birth year is listed as 1820 and birth place being South Carolina. Note that if "Milly" and Matilda were the same person, it is odd that Oct 1850 her birth state is South Carolina and in Dec 1850 a Missouri birth state is listed. On May 9, 1859 John McGehee and Matilda O’Barr were married in Conway, Arkansas. On June 17, 1859 John and Mathilda McGehee are mentioned in a land deal with CH Rogers. The 1860 Census (Arkansas, July 9) clearly depicts a "Matilda" with an estimated birth year of 1820 and born in Tennessee. Another O’Barr family member and researcher has noted that while she was born in South Carolina, her family settled in Tennessee when she was very young. The researcher felt this could be the explanation of the differing birth states. On April 13, 1869 the Divorce Case between John and Matilda is dismissed. The 1870 Census (Missouri, June 16) shows John having a new wife (Rosanna) with some step children. We have been unable to find any 1870 Census records for Matilda either as a McGehee or O’Barr. In 1875 there are Probate Records for the estate of John McGehee. His sister (Anna) and grandson (Joshua) are listed as Administrators. The 1880 Census (Arkansas, June 15) lists a Matilda O’Barr as a “Widow” living in her niece’s household. Her estimated birth year is 1812. SUMMARY: Based on the analysis and data discussed, it is highly probable that “Milly” and Mathilda were two separate people. Both were married to John McGehee. There are no documents that support “Milly” and Matilda are the same person. For example, had we found two versions of the 1858 Marriage Record … one with the name “Milly” and one with the name Matilda … then that would support they were the same person. But, we could not find that kind of supporting documents. The birth state differences in the 1850 Census cannot be ignored and strongly suggest that are documenting two different people. The only marriage record we can find for John is his marriage to Matilda O'Barr in 1858. His children, presumably who mother was “Milly”, supports a 1835 marriage date. It doesn't seem plausible that John would have children with “Milly” in the 1830s but not marry her until 1858. This further suggests that Milly and Matilda were different persons.

Bill for Divorce. Transcription: "On this day comes the Complainant and makes application to have this case continued. It is ordered by the court that this case is continued until next term of this Court."

Bill of Divorce. Transcription: "Comes the Plaintiff by solicitation and on his motion this case is dismissed at said Plaintiff's cost."

John McGehee Estate Probate Summary: Administrators - Anna McGehee (1875-1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878-1886) GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886). COURT SUMMARIES: January 20, 1875 Ann McGehee (probably John McGehee sister) is identified as the Admistratix (aka Administrator). She approved a claim against the estate. The court agreed and ordered that $41 be paid to A. Davis Fourth Class. Note that Fourth Class Claims are for money due employees of the decedent of not more than $800.00 for each claimant for services rendered within 4 months prior to the decedent's death and expenses attending the decedent's last illness. February 17, 1875 Ann McGehee presents a Bond to the court which is called "imperfect". She is cited and ordered to appear before the court with a new Bond or present reasons why she can't. May 19, 1876 Court claims that no account has been filed, as per required by the law, 12 months since the Letters of Administration were supplied. Ann (and possibly Thomas) is cited and ordered to appear before the next term of the court and present the account for settlement. July 12, 1876 The court claims that for the last 12 months there no account on file. The court issues Ann McGehee a citation and orders compliance. The wording of "Guardian" is crossed out and replaced with "Administration". This definitively suggests that John McGehee is deceased. November 9, 1876 Ann McGehee filed her account for final settlement. The court ordered that this settlement be inspected by all interested parties. The case is continued until the next court term. January 11, 1877 Ann McGehee appears before the court and presents the final settlement for John McGehee, Deceased, which was recorded on November 10, 1876. No issues are found with the final settlement and the court orders that Ann McGehee be charged with $27.90 and the Bond cancelled. The court further ordered that Ann McGehee and her securities be released from any further liabilities regarding the Bond. April 9, 1878 In Case #135, Wm J McGehee (probably William Joshua McGehee, John McGehee's grandson) is first identified as the Guardian. It is noted that he has provided a Bond which is sufficient. April 9, 1878 Case #137 is presented right after Case #135. It has exactly the same wording as Case #135; but, Wm J McGehee is now identified as the Administrator. It is noted that has provided a Bond which is sufficient. October 15,1878 Wm J McGehee provides an inventory of Personal/Real property and effects belong to his ward. The court approves the inventory. October 15, 1878 Nancy McGehee and Thomas Margaret claim that some of the estate property is perishable; namely, 4 milk cows with calves, 3 yearlings, 2 young steers, 3 horses, 2 feather beds, 2 bedsteads, and 1 lamb. The court orders Wm J McGehee to get the property appraised. After a 20 day period in which Wm J McGehee publicly posts the inventory, there is to be an auction at Nancy or Thomas' residence on November 16, 1878 at 10:00am. Those attendees paying less than $5 for an item shall pay cash. Those attendees paying more than $5 may get a credit of 12 months with 10% interest and post a note with approved security. April 15, 1879 Wm J McGehee presents an appraisement and Sale Bill. The court orders it to be recorded. Wm J McGehee is charged the sum of $211.65 July 16, 1879 Wm J McGehee presents to the court the status of the account which was filed on April 15, 1879 and advertised as directed. The court confirmed the account and orders that he be charged the sum of $72.93 November 9, 1881 Court proclamation to all interested parties, John McGehee's heirs, that the account is current. January 11, 1882 The court states that the account filed on November 9, 1881 is confirmed and Wm J McGehee charged with $290.27 January 9, 1883 Wm J McGehee is charged by the court the amount of $67 for the rent of the lands during 1882. He also submits his current account and the court deems it is current and advertised as the law directs. April 12, 1883 Court confirms that the annual account filed on January 9, 1883 is approved. The court further orders that the Wm J McGehee be charged with $265.60 balance which is due the wards. January 16, 1884 The court state that the 5th account filed by Wm J McGehee is current and ordered it advertised as the law directs. April 15, 1884 The court states the 5th account filed by Wm J McGehee is current and confirmed. The court orders that Wm J McGehee be charged $302.29 January 12, 1886 Wm J McGehee appears before the court to present the account. The court says it should be recorded and published as per the law. April 14, 1886 Wm J McGehee appears before the court to present the account which was filed on January 1886. The court examined the account and said it was current with no exceptions. The court ordered the Wm J McGehee charged $144.90

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 20, 1875 Ann McGehee (probably John McGehee sister) is identified as the Admistratix (aka Administrator). She approved a claim against the estate. The court agreed and ordered that $41 be paid to A. Davis Fourth Class. Note that Fourth Class Claims are for money due employees of the decedent of not more than $800.00 for each claimant for services rendered within 4 months prior to the decedent's death and expenses attending the decedent's last illness.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: February 17, 1875 Ann McGehee presents a Bond to the court which is called "imperfect". She is cited and ordered to appear before the court with a new Bond or present reasons why she can't.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: May 19, 1876 Court claims that no account has been filed, as per required by the law, 12 months since the Letters of Administration were supplied. Ann (and possibly Thomas) is cited and ordered to appear before the next term of the court and present the account for settlement.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: July 12, 1876 The court claims that for the last 12 months there no account on file. The court issues Ann McGehee a citation and orders compliance. The wording of "Guardian" is crossed out and replaced with "Administration". This definitively suggests that John McGehee is deceased.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: November 9, 1876 Court proclamation to all interested parties, John McGehee's heirs, that the account is current.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 11, 1877 Ann McGehee appears before the court and presents the final settlement for John McGehee, Deceased, which was recorded on November 10, 1876. No issues are found with the final settlement and the court orders that Ann McGehee be charged with $27.90 and the Bond cancelled. The court further ordered that Ann McGehee and her securities be released from any further liabilities regarding the Bond.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 9, 1878 Case #137 is presented right after Case #135. It has exactly the same wording as Case #135; but, Wm J McGeheee is now identified as the Administrator. It is noted that has provided a Bond which is sufficient.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 9, 1878 In Case #135, Wm J McGeHee (probably William Joshua McGehee, John McGehee's grandson) is first identified as the Guardian. It is noted that he has provided a Bond which is sufficient.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: October 15, 1878 Nancy McGehee and Thomas Margaret claim that some of the estate property is perishable; namely, 4 milk cows with calves, 3 yearlings, 2 young steers, 3 horses, 2 feather beds, 2 bedsteads, and 1 lamb. The court orders Wm J McGehee to get the property appraised. After a 20 day period in which Wm J McGehee publicly posts the inventory, there is to be an auction at Nancy or Thomas' residence on Novermber 16, 1878 at 10:00am. Those attendees paying less than $5 for an item shall pay cash. Those attendees paying more than $5 may get a credit of 12 months with 10% interest and post a note with approved security.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: October 15,1878 Wm J McGehee provides an inventory of Personal/Real property and effects belong to his ward. The court approves the inventory.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 15, 1879 Wm J McGehee presents an appraisement and Sale Bill. The court orders it to be recorded. Wm J McGehee is charged the sum of $211.65

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: July 16, 1879 Wm J McGehee presents to the court the status of the account which was filed on April 15, 1879 and advertised as directed. The court confirmed the account and orders that he be charged the sum of $72.93

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: November 9, 1881 Court proclamation to all interested parties, John McGehee's heirs, that the account is current.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 11, 1882 The court states that the account filed on November 9, 1881 is confirmed and Wm J McGehee charged with $290.27

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 9, 1883 Wm J McGehee is charged by the court the amount of $67 for the rent of the lands during 1882. He also submits his current account and the court deems it is current and advertised as the law directs.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 12, 1883 Court confirms that the annual account filed on January 9, 1883 is approved. The court further orders that the Wm J McGehee be charged with $265.60 balance which is due the wards.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 15, 1884 The court state that the 5th account filed by Wm J McGehee is current and ordered it advertised as the law directs.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 16, 1884 The court states the 5th account filed by Wm J McGehee is current and confirmed. The court orders that Wm J McGehee be charged $302.29

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: January 12, 1886 Wm J McGehee appears before the court to present the account. The court says it should be recorded and published as per the law.

GENERAL SUMMARY: Court records document the legal aspects of John McGehee's estate from 1875 to 1886. An estate Administrator was identified in court on January 20, 1875. This suggests that John McGehee died before this date. During the court proceedings, there are two separate Administrators: Ann McGehee (1875 to 1877) and William Joshua McGehee (1878 to 1886).

COURT SUMMARY: April 14, 1886 Wm J McGehee appears before the court to present the account which was filed on Janurary 1886. The court examined the account and said it was current with no exceptions. The court ordered the Wm J McGehee charged $144.90